Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019)'s score of 75.2. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is a just a little bit heavier and incredibly thicker device than Motorola razr (2019).
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little larger display. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Motorola razr (2019), and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back facing camera with a way better 25 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.