Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. Although Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola razr (2019) were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip body is just a little thicker but also somewhat lighter than Motorola razr (2019).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a just a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen, a better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.