Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. Xperia Z4v's body is extremely lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), but it is extremely thicker and was released 5 years before.
Xperia Z4v features a lot better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much higher pixel amount per inch of display. The Motorola razr (2019) features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra GPU. The Xperia Z4v shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Xperia Z4v has greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
The Xperia Z4v is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.