Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. Although it's the best we are comparing, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a much thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Motorola razr (2019). Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should count with identical operating system features.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little faster processor than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's memory capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the Motorola razr (2019) one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.