Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a general score of 87.3, which is better than Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F3 has 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10. The Xiaomi Poco F3 body is newer and a bit lighter, but thicker than Motorola razr (2019).
The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a brighter display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2019) and the Xiaomi Poco F3 count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.