Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also a little heavier and incredibly thicker. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little better pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019). Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 100 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.