Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. Even being the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it's also a a lot thicker and just a little bit heavier phone. These phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has newer 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Motorola razr (2019) both feature similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.