Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Google Pixel, with an 87 score against 80.2. Motorola razr (2020) is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Google Pixel, although it is also notably heavier. The Google Pixel has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a just a little higher screen pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better resolution camera, a larger camera aperture and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.