Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the HTC U11, having an 87 score against 77.6. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier phone than HTC U11, but they are 0.31inches thick. The HTC U11 has a sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) has much more storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. Motorola razr (2020) features a better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy HTC U11, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.