Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Although Motorola razr (2020) and the Moto G Power were released only a couple of months apart, Motorola razr (2020) is thinner and a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give very similar operating system features.
The Moto G Power has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite higher screen density, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2300px and a quite bigger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
The Moto G Power has a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Power, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.