Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2020) captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a much more MP camera.
The Moto Z Force features improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can get Moto Z Force, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.