Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 87 score against 77.4. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is much newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's incredibly thicker and heavier. Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments, a back camera with way more MP and a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.