Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Moto Z2 Play, with an 87 score against 77.4. The Motorola razr (2020) design is way newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it's notably heavier and much thicker. Moto Z2 Play counts with a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) has just a little better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Moto Z2 Play has a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot higher resolution camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.