Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Galaxy A30s, with an 87 score against 79.8. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give you all the same OS features. Although Motorola razr (2020) is newer than Galaxy A30s, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 876 x 2142 resolution. The Galaxy A30s counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
The Galaxy A30s has a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.