Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), getting a 91.1 score against 87. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer and a little bit lighter device than the Motorola razr (2020), but it is just a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bigger display, a just a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processor than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a larger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Galaxy A52s features a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.