Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Galaxy M20, having an 87 score against 78.9. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit heavier than Galaxy M20, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M20 has a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.