Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is slightly better than Galaxy M30's 82.4 general score. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a little heavier than Galaxy M30. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M30 has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Galaxy M30 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.