Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Galaxy M40, getting an 87 score against 85. Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat heavier device than Galaxy M40, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy M40 has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Galaxy M40 features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 has greater battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.