Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a a little heavier phone than the Motorola razr (2020), but they are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020). They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures in low light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G features as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola razr (2020), they have the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.