Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola razr (2020), having a 98 score against 87. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11. Even being the best phone we compare here, we must note that it is also a heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger display, a better pixel quantity in each inch of display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a much higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs the same than the Motorola razr (2020), making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.