Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Phantom black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 score. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola razr (2020).
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display.
Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.