Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with a general score of 93.4 against 87. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it is also just a little thinner and lighter than Motorola razr (2020). Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy S22 and Motorola razr (2020) feature quite similar CPUs, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures, a much higher video definition and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S22 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.