Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s general score of 87. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer device than Motorola razr (2020), but it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a greater display pixels density. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.