Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is lighter and notably thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little worse 876 x 2142 resolution, a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 45% bigger battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera with a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.