Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s general score of 87. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11, so it gives lots of additional features and a performance increase. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Motorola razr (2020) were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit better pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light environments, a much larger sensor and a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola razr (2020) one, they have the same internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola razr (2020), which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.