Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 score. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide very similar OS features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola razr (2020) were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little better amount of pixels in each display inch, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola razr (2020) feature incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior CPU than Motorola razr (2020). They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Motorola razr (2020) has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.