Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features and optimized performance. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, it's thinner and newer.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater pixels number per display inch.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same sensor size, the same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.