Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's overall score of 83.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design is extremely newer and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's, although it's a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola razr (2020) one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.