Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting a score of 81.1 against 81. Motorola razr (2022)'s construction is a lot newer and a little bit thinner, but heavier than the LG G7 ThinQ. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2022) has the older 12 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better processing power than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Motorola razr (2022) captures clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.