Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), having an 82.5 score against 81.1. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is a lot older than the Motorola razr (2022), it's body is just a little thinner and extremely lighter. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Motorola razr (2022) features a little faster CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2022) has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.