Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 global score. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is a lot older than the Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is a little bit thinner and much lighter. The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher display pixel density. Motorola razr (2022) takes much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.