Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola razr (2022), having an 81.2 score against 81.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. The LG V40 ThinQ body has the same thickness than Motorola razr (2022), but it is somewhat lighter.
Motorola razr (2022) features just a little better processing power than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher display density.
Motorola razr (2022) captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and video in low light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.