Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), with an 81.3 score against 81.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A31 is much older and somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's body is still a little lighter.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a quite bigger display. The Galaxy A31 features a better storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2022) features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.