Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 global score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A41 has the older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A41 is extremely older and a bit thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's body is still a lot lighter.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A41 have incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A41 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A41 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A41 features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery life in Motorola razr (2022).
The Galaxy A41 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels resolution, a tinier aperture and a worse (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.