Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Even though the Motorola razr (2022) is notably heavier than Galaxy A5 (2017), it's just a bit thinner and also much newer. The Motorola razr (2022) has a little sharper display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a way better (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with way more MP. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.