Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting a general score of 83.8 against 81.1. The Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than Motorola razr (2022), but it is lighter. The Motorola razr (2022) has a slightly better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite lower pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A50 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola razr (2022) shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a much better video definition and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.