Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2022), with a general score of 86.6 against 81.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction has the same thickness than Motorola razr (2022), but it's somewhat lighter.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A50s has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.