Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2022), with an 85.5 score against 81.1. Although the Galaxy A51 is older and a little bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit lower screen density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Motorola razr (2022) features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a less mega pixels back-facing camera, a lower (4K) video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures.
Galaxy A51 has a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.