Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola razr (2022), having a 90.8 score against 81.1. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way older and thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's design is still a bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos. The Galaxy A51 5G features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G has superior battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.