Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola razr (2022), having a overall score of 91.3 against 81.1. The Galaxy A52 5G is an older and a little thicker phone than Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 12 OS (operating system).
The Motorola razr (2022) has a slightly better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.