Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. The Motorola razr (2022) body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A70's, but it is also just a bit heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2022) has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A70. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a screen with the same size. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A70 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.