Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), having a general score of 87.5 against 81.1. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a lighter phone than Motorola razr (2022), but both of them are equally thin.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A71. They have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a display of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A71 has greater battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a bigger aperture and a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.