Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola razr (2022), with a global score of 92.9 against 81.1. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a older and a little bit thicker device than Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung was able to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have the same display density, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a same size screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.