Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than Galaxy A8 (2018), having a global score of 81.1 against 79.2. The Motorola razr (2022) design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it's somewhat heavier. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A8 (2018) features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola razr (2022) features a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much more megapixels back camera. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 17% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.