Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a lot older and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's design is still a bit lighter. The Motorola razr (2022) features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a superior storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a little better battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 9% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.