Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-08-18 | -- |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is slightly better than the Galaxy Alpha, with a global score of 81.1 against 76.3. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2022) has the older 12 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, Motorola razr (2022) is a incredibly heavier and thicker phone than Galaxy Alpha.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy Alpha features a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a much smaller screen and a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.