Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola razr (2022), with a 98.9 score against 81.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than Motorola razr (2022). These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12, counting with a lot of extra features and better performance.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Motorola razr (2022), and although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.