Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2022)'s overall score of 81.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body is lighter than Motorola razr (2022), but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2022) features a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.