Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 81.1 score against 79.3. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, counting with some nice extra features. Motorola razr (2022)'s body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola razr (2022) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.