Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a global score of 81.1 against 80.4. Motorola razr (2022) is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. Motorola razr (2022) features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2022) takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.